NFL DFS Dart Board: Week 11

He doesn't exactly fit the mold of a bargain if you're looking at the FD price, but under $5K on DK and under $15 on Yahoo certainly qualify. If you're wondering why he didn't make the Playbook after I discussed his revenge-game narrative all week, it's simple – Adrian Peterson. Foreman is going to see a strong share of the carries, but there is obvious concern that, when the Titans are at the goal-line, Peterson gets the nod from head coach Mike Vrabel. Foreman gives you a decent bargain running back option for GPP tournaments, so if you need to save a few shekels on DK and Yahoo, he might be a worthy pivot off the Jeff Wilsons and Mark Ingrams of the world.

While everyone oohs and aahs over Elijah Moore's numbers over these last three weeks, keep in mind that Joe Flacco is under center and he could, very easily, turn to what he knows and not to some rookie wideout. During his first stint with the Jets, Flacco had Crowder as his top target and is very likely to go right back to him, especially with a match-up against struggling slot-corners Justin Coleman and Nik Needham. He's priced up a little more than we would like on Fan Duel, but as a salary-saver here on DK, Crowder could be a huge boost to your lineups.

As I mentioned in the Hunter Renfrow write-up in the Playbook, Edwards is in just as good a spot as any with this match-up against the Bengals secondary. But with everyone salivating over Renfrow, Edwards becomes the guy you want to pivot to in large-field GPP tournaments. His ownership forecast right now is like a five-percent differential, but once the final numbers come in, I am expecting a much wider margin. He only sees about four targets per game, but he's got touchdowns in two of his last three and the price is definitely right.

If you're looking for a way to get exposure to the Kansas City side of this game but don't want to spend up for the big boys, Hardman becomes an option for those setting multiple lineups in large-field multi-entry GPP tournaments. He was averaging about six targets per game before last week's minimized effort, but still has plenty of potential, especially in a match-up like this where everyone is feasting on the top names and ignoring the rest.

As Jon Impemba pointed out on the NFL DFS Podcast, the Saints biggest weakness in coverage is against the slot receiver. They've been flip-flopping between Bradley Roby and P.J. Williams with the latter seeing the bulk of the snaps over the last two games. And if you recall from years past, Williams has always been one of my favorite targets in DFS. He sucks in coverage. Sucks. There's no nice way to put it, so please don't send this to his mom or wife or girlfriend. But it's true. Watkins has fantastic potential to sneak into the end zone with this match-up and could be a huge savings for your lineups.

LATE ADD – IN truth, I'm not sure how I forgot Wilson, especially with the news on Amari Cooper and the fact that we haven't heard anything regarding any of the other wide receivers in Dallas. Wilson carved out a decent role for himself while Michael Gallup was out and should be involved fairly heavily during three-receiver sets. Prescott is going to have to spread the ball around to keep the Chiefs defense off-balance and the speedy Wilson moving in and out of the slot is going to be a very helpful weapon.

Hmmmm. Which TE Whisperer came a-calling first here? Was it me on the Fantasy Alarm Show? Was it Andrew Coooper in the TE coach? Or is Impemba trying to mow our lawn now with TE whispers on the podcast? Either way, the three of us have all said the exact same thing – Logan Thomas saw 100% of the snaps when he played. Ricky Seals-Jones played 100% of the snaps when it was his turn to start and now it looks like with both out, Bates is in line for the same treatment. In fact, he saw 100% of the snaps following RSJ's exit last week. Carolina plays the tight end pretty well, but they're still allowing almost 50 receiving yards per game to them and they've allowed just over 11 fantasy points per game on average too.